Thread:Saruhikofushimis/@comment-5785681-20190403162411/@comment-27002267-20190404103109

Hey there, I'm a bit concerned with the way user rights is being handled here. Shouldn't promotion of user rights be based on the time and amount of contributions a user has spent on the respective wiki, not on other wikis or sites? Besides Luxartisan, I've never seen a FANDOM user be promoted to admin, yet alone bureaucrat, with just 100+ edits on the respective wiki (in my 5 years of editing). Most wikis enable request for bureaucratic position when a user reaches 500-1000 edits after consistent editing for 6-10 months. I am aware that each wiki has a different way of management, but contributions to the particular wiki should take precedence over contributions to other wikis, no matter how big or small.

When asked by User:Taritsukii, whether she could receive rollback rights, you mentioned that vandalism can be reverted without the rights and that two admins are enough. Then in the case of bureaucrats, one is more than enough for managing this wiki. Because bureaucratic status cannot be removed by anyone except staff or the user themselves, it should be restricted to a limited amount to prevent misuse. This is a common practice across FANDOM wikis.

I am not doubting your capabilities, Luxartisan, but I think the position of bureaucrat should be earned with higher contribution and user activity, not just past administrative experience. This is just my opinion, the final call once again goes to Saruhikofushimis.