Thread:Luxartisan/@comment-5785681-20190427162340/@comment-27869316-20190504153316

If we're having a page for STYLE FIVE then I agree, having a page for OLDCODEX (and other creative producers) sounds like a good idea; before we do though, should we include OLDCODEX's full discography on their article page or just keep it to the singles they've released in relation to the series? (my preference is for full discography but its good to check these things before actually making the page)

I've just been categorizing things as usual for now Tari until we've definitively settled on a final form of the cat tree and as a team start to convert to the new system, but Angelle may feel differently. If you were to go by the currently proposed tree though I believe the necessary categories for STYLE FIVE's page would be: "Creative" & probably "Music"? At the time I made my proposed sub section of the tree I forgot to factor in STYLE FIVE & OLDCODEX but I would have put them under music as well as creative (sorry I forgot to consider this earlier). So, we could create a further subcat under "Music" for "Bands" like so:

++Music

+++Themes

++++Opening themes etc. etc.

+++Bands

++++STYLE FIVE

++++OLDCODEX

whereupon both pages would end up having just "Creative" and "Bands" as categories, if I've understood these trees correctly.

(glad to see you got your sig working Tari ^^)

-Fox 15:33, May 4, 2019 (UTC)