Thread:Saruhikofushimis/@comment-5785681-20190718031102/@comment-5785681-20190718201725

You're not doing a single disagreeable thing. If you were, I'd say something, politely, of course. I will, however, look through the wiki and compile a list of which cats might be better off as articles and vice versa. In truth, this might be a total non-issue. I hope you're viewing the wiki via Classic Category modality. I find it's the best way to evaluate what's working and what's not re: categorization at a glance. Of course, adding/deleting categories is still on the table for group discussion. I would mention my feelings about the overarching cats here, but I think it best to wait for the group review. However, since you mention Media... while moving articles from Related Media to Media, Media suddenly got very crowded. I didn't want to just delete the category entirely since the articles were subcats on the CT, so they fell under Media. We can discuss if that's proper in review, if that's ok with you. I'll add this topic to the list and send the entire thing over as soon as I get it typed up. Angelle 20:17, July 18, 2019 (UTC)