Thread:Luxartisan/@comment-27869316-20190602165430/@comment-5785681-20190614162509

The main issue I have with the affiliations staying at the top of the main category page is that they overshadow the User's choice of how they wish to view the page by superceding how I believe Wikia means the page to be seen by providing pre-set options. Moreover, the Affiliations as presented, imo, still do not represent the characters in an equitable light while a separate page from a headlined link can become a highlighted feature that can be expanded, perhaps even a Main Page feature (with modifications).

Fox or Yuji, can you clarify why a link at the top of the Category page linking to an Affiliations page is insufficient for a User to find such information for those Users who wish to find that info via that mode versus those Users who do not? There are always both types. I, for example, prefer as many choices as possible when visiting a wikia and having the Affiliations where it is currently located somewhat "forces" me use that method to locate characters by making it the first thing I see when I go that category. And please understand I do not mean the word "forced" with a negative connotation, simply descriptive.

I see this as likely for other Users, too, because most won't bother to look beyond that initial presentation. However, a link (large in text at the top of the page - highlighted if possible) will offer them an alternate choice and make the wiki a more user-friendly environment without negating the work/effort put into the visual of Characters by Affilation. I recognize this. Always have.

Another option is to list the Affilations at the bottom of the Category page, which is another option as it would also be seen as an alternative choice instead of having it at the top of the page. It's still on the page, but not seen as the "primary" way or "forced" way to find characters.

I'm trying to offer options hoping to meet everyone's needs --- the Users', the original editor's, the concurring editor's, the differing editor's, the neutral editors'. I hope one of them is seen as doable since this is something I view as important. That said, if anyone else has a workable solution, I'm open to it. I respect our process, but also think we have a strong enough working team to sort this out in a way that satisfies everyone's beliefs.

Angelle 16:25, June 14, 2019 (UTC)